Patrick v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtFriedman, J.
Among the various and sometimes contradictory legal responses to the current opioid epidemic has been the decision by some state's attorneys to charge the sellers of heroin with homicide crimes when a buyer dies from overdose. 1 This case follows one of those prosecutions. We do not prejudge future cases nor make any broad pronouncement about the trend. Rather, we hold here only that in prosecutions for involuntary manslaughter, the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt the existence of a causal nexus between the defendant's act and the victim's death. Because it did not do so here, we…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. AlbrechtCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- State v. GibsonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968
- Duren v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
- State v. PagottoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- State v. KramerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Stracke v. Estate of ButlerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
- State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
- Christa Yorbor v. Harvest Direct, LLC, et al.District Court, D. Maryland · 2026
- Stracke v. Estate of ButlerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
- Tolan v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2019