Legal Opinion

In Interest of Md (S)

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1992No. 90-0659, 90-1369PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALLOW, WILLIAM G., J.

This is a review under sec. (Rule) 809.62, Stats., of a published decision of the court of appeals, In Interest of M.D.(S), 163 Wis. 2d 687, 472 N.W.2d 819 (Ct. App. 1991), which affirmed a decision of the circuit court for Dane County, Judge Daniel R. Moeser. The court of appeals held that a statutory right to appointment of counsel in a termination of parental rights proceeding does not encompass a right to effective counsel. The sole issue on review is whether the petitioners were entitled to effective counsel where a statute confers the right to appointed counsel in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. In Re Carrington H.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2016
  2. In re A.S.Montana Supreme Court · 2004
  3. New Jersey Division of Youth & Family Services v. B.R.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
  4. McGee v. BartowCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  5. In the Interest of K.L.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2002

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API