Legal Opinion

In the Interest of E. K.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 28, 2006No. A06A1302PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Phipps, Judge.

The father of E. K. appeals an order of the juvenile court terminating his parental rights. He contends that the court erred in finding that the child was deprived, that the deprivation was likely to continue and would not be remedied, and that termination of his parental rights was in the child’s best interest. Finding no error, we affirm.

The termination of parental rights is a two-step process.1

The first step requires a finding of parental misconduct or inability, which requires clear and convincing evidence that: (1) the child is deprived; (2) lack of proper parental care or…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stills v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  2. In the Interest of S. H. P.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  3. In the Interest of A. M.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  4. In the Interest of A. C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  5. In the Interest of T. B.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In the Interest of K. A. C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  2. In Re EkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  3. In Re KacCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  4. In the Interest of J. D.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API