Legal Opinion

Maysay v. Hickman

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided August 1, 1936PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPortrum, J.

The plaintiff below, Maysay, recovered a judgment against the defendant Hickman, but upon the motion for a new trial the judge sustained the motion and directed a verdict in favor of the defendant, dismissing the plaintiff’s suit, the jury having found in favor of the defendant Harry Summers. This action of the trial judge is assigned as error for the reason- that it is insisted a presumption arose from the proven facts in favor of the plaintiff and the jury was justified in returning a verdict upon this presumption.

This suit is predicated upon an automobile a&cident, when the defendant’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Frank v. WrightTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Woodfin v. InselCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1931
  3. Ballow v. Postal Telegraph Cable Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1930
  4. Lawson v. Producers & Refiners Corp. of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Emert v. WilkersonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Midwest Dairy Products Co. v. Esso Standard Oil Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API