Legal Opinion
Woolfalk v. New York City Housing Authority
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 1, 1999PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Emily Goodman, J.), entered May 12, 1998, which granted plaintiffs’ motion to set aside the verdict, and awarded judgment as to liability in favor of plaintiffs as a matter of law, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
It is well settled that a landlord who has notice of a child under seven years old living in one of its apartments is a landlord who has notice of any hazardous lead condition in that apartment causing injury to that child. The Court of Appeals stated so repeatedly in Juarez v Wavecrest Mgt. Team (88 NY2d 628): “Under the statutory scheme,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Juarez v. Wavecrest Management Team Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Rivas v. 1340 Hudson Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Nwaru v. Leeds Management Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Cartagena v. Jin Lung TangAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3Cited by11 opinions
- Munoz v. 42 Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Herrera v. PersaudAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Concepcion v. WalshAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Munoz v. Mael Equities, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Castillo v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.