Legal Opinion

Munoz v. 42 Holding Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 29, 2006PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Dianne T. Renwick, J.), entered December 9, 2005, which denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant met its prima facie burden of establishing lack of notice that a child no more than seven years of age resided in the subject apartment. However, based on multiple repairs al*362legedly made in the apartment by the superintendent, and the fact that plaintiff and the superintendent lived on the same floor, plaintiff raised material issues of fact as to whether defendant had constructive…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Juarez v. Wavecrest Management Team Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Woolfalk v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Polanco v. Creston Avenue Properties, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Concepcion v. WalshAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. Ibert v. Tuscan Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. E.S. v. Windsor Owners Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024
  5. E.S. v. Windsor Owners Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API