Commonwealth v. Young
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the Court
None of the assignments of error now argued on appeal (see Commonwealth v. Watkins, 375 Mass. 472, 474 n.2 [1978]) warrants reversal of the judgment of conviction. 1. It is the settled rule in this Commonwealth that, *954in the absence of constitutional requirements, severance rests in the sound discretion of the trial judge. Commonwealth v. Jervis, 368 Mass. 638, 645 (1975), and cases cited. Commonwealth v. Drew, 4 Mass. App. Ct. 30, 33 (1976). There was no abuse of that discretion in this instance. See Commonwealth v. Rosenthal, 211 Mass. 50, 54 (1912). The only aspect of the defendant’s…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Commonwealth v. WatkinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Commonwealth v. CruzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Commonwealth v. BysMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Commonwealth v. BlowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Commonwealth v. YoungMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Commonwealth v. PellegriniMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Vance v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1988
- Commonwealth v. YoungMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
- State of Iowa v. Maurice D. Angel and Kemia B. McDowellSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.