Polich v. Whalen's O. K. Tire Warehouse
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Weber
The insurance carrier appeals from a judgment in the Workers’ Compensation Court finding the claimant totally and permanently disabled and converting his future biweekly benefits into a lump sum payment. Appellant questions the sufficiency of the evidence presented to the court in support of a lump sum payment and questions whether claimant is entitled to attorney fees and costs. We affirm the judgment of the Workers’ Compensation Court.
The following issues are presented to this Court for review:
1. Whether there was sufficient evidence to support the Workers’ Compensation Court’s holding that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Codling v. Aztec Well Servicing Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
- Willoughby v. Arthur G. McKee & Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1980
- Laukaitis v. Sisters of Charity of LeavenworthMontana Supreme Court · 1959
- Utick v. UtickMontana Supreme Court · 1979
- Kent v. SievertMontana Supreme Court · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Krause v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1982
- Dameron v. Neumann Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1983
- Ruple v. Bob Peterson Logging Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1984
- Polich v. Whalen's O.K. Tire WarehouseMontana Supreme Court · 1983
- Komeotis v. Williamson FencingMontana Supreme Court · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.