In re Lee

Justice MOORE:

In this appeal, we are asked whether the trial judge erred by accepting appellant’s conditional guilty pleas. We vacate in part and remand.

*219FACTS

Appellant was charged with disturbing school and threatening a public official in January 2004. He filed a motion to quash the charge based on the unconstitutionality of S.C.Code Ann. § 16-17-420 (Supp.2005), on the grounds it was unconstitutionally vague and overbroad.1 The motion was denied by Judge George McFaddin, Jr.

Subsequently, appellant was charged with disturbing school in September 2004, by hitting two students, and disturbing…