Legal Opinion
In Re Amir X.S.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided November 6, 2006No. 26219PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Chief Justice TOAL:
This case involves a constitutional attack on a statute defining the offense of disturbing schools. The family court upheld the statute’s constitutionality and subsequently adjudicated Appellant delinquent for violating the statute. We affirm in part and vacate in part.
Factual/Procedural Background
The State filed a juvenile petition in family court in October 2004 alleging that Amir X.S. (“Appellant”) violated S.C.Code Ann. § 16-17-420 (2003) by willfully, unlawfully, and unnecessarily interfering with and disturbing the students and teachers at Southside Learning Center in…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Niya Kenny v. Alan WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
- Carolina Youth Action Project v. Alan WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023
- State v. NeumanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
- South Carolina Department of Social Services v. Michelle G.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
- State v. GreenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.