Legal Opinion
State v. Randolph
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided November 8, 2004No. S04G0674PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BENHAM, Justice.
The Court of Appeals granted an interlocutory appeal to review the trial court’s denial of defendant Scott Fitz Randolph’s motion to suppress evidence seized from his home in a warrantless search conducted by law enforcement officers pursuant to permission given by Randolph’s wife in Randolph’s presence after Randolph had refused to give the officers permission to search. The Court of Appeals determined the motion to suppress should have been granted. Randolph v. State, 264 Ga. App. 396 (1) (590 SE2d 834) (2003). We granted the State’s petition for a writ of certiorari to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- State v. LeachWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- In Re the Welfare of D.A.G.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Presnell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Georgia v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- United States v. Vernon Snype, Marisa HicksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Black v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- United States v. HudspethCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- State v. BrunettiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.