Legal Opinion

Peters v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided August 8, 1933No. Docket No. 54050PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*978OPINION.

Goodrich:

It may be fairly inferred from the records that petitioner, perhaps because discouraged concerning the prospects of profitable continuance of Mason, Inc., decided to liquidate his investment in a stock which had depreciated in value in order that he might, by application of the loss thus sustained, reduce his income, and consequently his tax thereon. But, if incurred in a bona fide transaction, a loss is not to be disallowed merely because it was deliberately sustained as a means of reducing tax liability. United States v. Isham, 84 U.S. 496; Bullen v. Wisconsin, 240 U.S.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. IshamSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Bullen v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Atkins v. AtkinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  4. Talbot v. TalbotSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1911
  5. Woodard v. WoodardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rand Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1933
  2. Dennett v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934
  3. Wells v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1933
  4. Dennett v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934
  5. Peters v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API