Legal Opinion

Laura Hollister, American Community Mutual Insurance Company, Intervenor v. Dayton-Hudson Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 25, 1999No. 98-1660PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GILMAN, Circuit Judge.

Laura Hollister, a citizen of Michigan, was severely burned when the shirt that she was wearing ignited upon contact with a hot electric burner on her apartment stove. She brought a products-liability lawsuit based upon an alleged design defect against Dayton-Hudson Corporation, the Minnesota-based owner of the department store where the shirt was purchased. Finding that Hollister had failed to establish a prima facie case of design defect under Michigan’s “risk-utility test,” the district court granted Dayton-Hudson’s motion for summary judgment.

The district…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Terry Smith v. Ameritech Ameritech Publishing, Inc. Sickness and Accident Disability Benefit Plan Long Term Disability PlanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  4. Prentis v. Yale Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Owens v. Allis-Chalmers Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Laura Hollister, American Community Mutual Insurance Company, Intervenor v. Dayton Hudson CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  2. Hollister v. Dayton HudsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API