Legal Opinion
Mitchell v. Maurer
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 23, 1933No. 7262PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SAWTELLE, Circuit Judge.
On April 20, 1933, there was filed in the court below a petition for the appointment of ancillary receivers for the appellee corporation, and an ex parte order on that petition was signed by the District Judge, appointing two such receivers.
On May 2, 1933, the appellant herein, as insurance commissioner of the state of California, filed in the above proceedings a motion to vacate the order appointing the receivers, to dissolve the restraining order, to dismiss the petition for the appointment of receivers, and to re-examine the ex parte order appointing the receivers.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brockett v. BrockettSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
- Morse v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Mortgage Loan Co. v. LivingstonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
- Citizens Bank of Michigan City v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Janus v. United States Ex Rel. HumphreyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Leishman v. Associated Wholesale Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
- Menashe v. SuttonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1947
- Zimmern v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936