Matarese v. Buka
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Hara Frossard
After a jury trial, defendant Jonathan Buka, M.D., an ophthalmologist, was found not liable in plaintiff Gloria Matarese’s medical malpractice claim. On appeal, plaintiff contends: (1) she is entitled to a new trial based on an erroneous jury instruction concerning professional negligence; and (2) the trial court erred in prohibiting her testimony about events after a certain visit to defendant. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the judgment of the circuit court.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff filed a complaint seeking monetary damages for injuries sustained following cataract surgery in December…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Advincula v. United Blood ServicesIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
- Schultz v. NORTHEAST ILL. REGIONAL COMMUTER RAILROAD CORP.Illinois Supreme Court · 2002
- Jones v. Chicago HMO Ltd. of IllinoisIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
- York v. Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
- Loman v. FreemanIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Studt v. Sherman Health SystemsIllinois Supreme Court · 2011
- Taylor v. County of CookAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
- Studt v. Sherman Health SystemsIllinois Supreme Court · 2011
- Perkey v. Portes-JorolAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
- Auten v. FranklinAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.