Legal Opinion

Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. Hemenover

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 29, 1937No. 13,772PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Burke

These parties are hereinafter referred to as follows: Plaintiff in error as the company, Edgar E. Hemenover as Edgar, Roy E. Cook as Cook, Harriett F. Hemenover as Harriett, and one Ruby A. Howell, deceased, as Mrs. Howell. At the time of the trial of this cause Edgar was twenty-five years of age and Harriett seventeen. They were the only children of Mrs. Howell. Cook and Edgar were guardians of the estate of Harriett.

Mrs. Howell carried a $5,000 life policy in the company. Her children were the beneficiaries. A double indemnity clause increased this sum to $10,000 in case of accidental…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Landress v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Western Commercial Travelers' Ass'n v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
  3. Caldwell v. Travelers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1924
  4. Brown v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  5. Taylor v. New York Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Beckham v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  2. Matter of Estate of DaigleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  3. Gulf Life Insurance Company v. NashSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  4. Zinn v. Equitable Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Carroll v. Cuna Mutual Insurance SocietySupreme Court of Colorado · 1995

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API