Legal Opinion

Salt Lake City v. Roberts

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 2002No. 20000679PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURRANT, Justice.

INTRODUCTION

1 On writ of certiorari, plaintiff Salt Lake City seeks review of Salt Lake City v. Roberts, 2000 UT App. 201, 7 P.3d 789, in which a divided Utah Court of Appeals construed a Salt Lake City ordinance criminalizing sexual conduct in a "place open to public view" as requiring the sexual conduct occur in a place where it "is likely to be observed by a member of the public." The court of appeals adopted this definition from the case law of other jurisdictions. Because the Salt Lake City Code provides a definition establishing the meaning of a "place open to public…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Gill v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Evans v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. LeeUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. MorrisonUtah Supreme Court · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. MartinezUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  2. GeoMetWatch Corp. v. Utah State Univ. Research Found.Utah Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Pinetree Associates v. Ephraim CityUtah Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Salt Lake City v. NewmanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2005
  5. B.S.V. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API