Legal Opinion

Ward v. City of Mitchell

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1987No. 86-160PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

Donald R. Ward appeals from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Court denying him benefits. The only error assigned is that the compensation court erred in finding Ward had not proved by a preponderance of the evidence that his symptoms were caused by his work-related exposure to polychlorinated biphenyl, also known as PCB. We affirm.

Factual determinations of the Workers’ Compensation Court will not be set aside on appeal unless they are clearly wrong. Beavers v. IBP, Inc., 222 Neb. 647, 385 N.W.2d 896 (1986); Snyder v. IBP, Inc., 222 Neb. 534, 385 N.W.2d 424 (1986); Vredeveld v. Gelco…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Vredeveld v. Gelco ExpressNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Snyder v. IBP, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Beavers v. IBP, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1986

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mendoza v. Omaha Meat ProcessorsNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Nice v. IBP, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Rodgers v. SparksNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Mendoza v. Omaha Meat ProcessorsNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Michie v. Anderson BuildersNebraska Court of Appeals · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API