Legal Opinion

City of Tyler v. Bruck

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 1, 1954No. 6694PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FANNING, Justice.

Leonard. Bruck and others were the owners of a residence in the City of Tyler, and certain personal property therein. The house was vacated. On January 2, 1951, Leonard Bruck requested the city to cut off the water. About January 23, 1951, Bruck discovered the water was still on at the premises and he talked by telephone to a lady at the City Water Department, advising her that the water was on, stating to her, “Maybe you better cut it off; might come a freeze and do damage * * * and suggest that the water be cut offand the lady advised that it would be attended to that. day.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wisconsin & Michigan Railway Co. v. PowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Mann Bros. v. City of HendersonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  3. Coker v. BenjaminCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  4. Prescott v. JonesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1898
  5. Mercantile National Bank v. McCullough Tool Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Barfield v. Howard M. Smith Company of AmarilloTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Steubner Realty 19, Ltd. v. Cravens Road 88, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. El Paso National Bank v. Southwest Numismatic Investment Group, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Continental Credit Corporation v. NormanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  5. UAW-CIO Local 31 Credit Union v. Royal Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API