Legal Opinion
San Francisco Human Services Agency v. N.M.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 5, 2010No. A124534PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JONES, P. J.
N.M. appeals, contending the juvenile court erred when it denied his request to be declared a presumed father. We conclude the trial court applied the applicable statutes correctly and will affirm.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On June 3, 2008, the San Francisco Human Services Agency (the Agency) filed a petition alleging that 14-year-old E.O. and her seven-year-old sister Y.O. were dependent children within the meaning of Welfare and Institutions Code section 300. The petition alleged the girls’ mother, N.O. (mother), had failed to protect E.O. from repeated sexual…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re Zacharia D.California Supreme Court · 1993
- Francisco G. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- People v. M.B.California Court of Appeal · 2009
3Cited by8 opinions
- Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Ivy B.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. Roger S.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Richard B.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. Jade M.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Tyrone M.California Court of Appeal · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.