Palomita, Inc. v. Medley
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KENNEDY, Justice.
The appellant, Palomita, Inc., was the defendant in an action by appellee, Miriam C. Medley, independent executrix of the estate of Maurice W. Medley, for an amount owed to Maurice W. Medley for work done on premises owned by appellant. After a trial to the court, judgment was entered for appellee, in addition to imposition and foreclosure of constitutional and statutory mechanic's liens on appellant’s property to satisfy the judgment, interest and attorney’s fees. This appeal is limited to a consideration of the validity of the statutory lien itself and of attaching…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Pickett v. BishopTexas Supreme Court · 1949
- Smith Et Ux. v. SorelleTexas Supreme Court · 1935
- Tigner v. First Nat. Bank of AngletonTexas Supreme Court · 1954
- First National Bank in Graham v. SledgeTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- Kmiec v. ReaganTexas Supreme Court · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- AMS Const. Co., Inc. v. Warm Springs Rehabilitation Foundation, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
- Amegy Bank National Ass'n v. Brazos M & E, Ltd. (In Re Bigler LP)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2011
- Ambassador Development Corp. v. ValdezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Dossman v. National Loan Investors, L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992
- Import Systems International, Inc. v. Houston Central IndustriesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.