Legal Opinion
Dovalina v. Albert
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided November 28, 1966No. 7661PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHAPMAN, Justice.
The principal subject matter of this suit constitutes an attack upon the constitutionality of Article 2615f-2, Vernon’s Ann. Texas Revised Civil Statutes (1965), titled Polygraph Examiners Act. Appellant is Práxedis J. Dovalina, who failed the examination required under the named article that is designed to insure that all operators of polygraph equipment in Texas meet minimum standards of competence. Appellees are the members of the Board of Polygraph Examiners, sued individually and as members of the Board. A writ of mandamus was sought requiring the Board to issue a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Travelers Insurance v. MarshallTexas Supreme Court · 1934
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. WalkerTexas Supreme Court · 1935
- State Highway Department v. GorhamTexas Supreme Court · 1942
- Henderson Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- State Board of Dispensing Opticians v. SchwabArizona Supreme Court · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Barshop v. Medina County Underground Water Conservation DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Lester v. 1st American Bk Bryan Tx, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1993
- Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Brooks v. Northglen Ass'n, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2002
- Crosland v. Texas Employment CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.