Legal Opinion
United States v. Joseph Earl Dilts and Larry E. Cravens
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 9, 1974No. 73-1827, 73-1828PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.,A jury found both appellants guilty of eight separate violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2314 and 2. 1 The indictment charged the defendants with causing the interstate transportation of eight forged checks. Each check was purportedly drawn by the Safeco Insurance Company on the Boatmen’s National Bank of St. Louis, and made payable to John R. Stack; six of the checks were in the amount of $168.03 and two were for $987.72.
The evidence showed that the appellants, together with the government’s witness Baker, decided in December, 1972, to make some money by utilizing blank Safeco checks in…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Quercia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Morris W. Gordon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. Charles Armen Calabrese, Samuel Ray Calabrese, Charles R. KnowlesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Maria L. SayanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- Terrence Barber v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Howard Lee WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Emil Crovedi v. United States of America, Frank Delegge, Sr. v. United States of America, James Spoon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.