Legal Opinion

Grabow v. PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided April 5, 2004No. 4:04-cr-00046PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

EAGAN, District Judge.

This removed action comes before the Court pursuant to plaintiffs Motion to Remand (Dkt. # 5) filed January 28, 2004. As set forth in the Class Action Petition filed in state court, plaintiff Michelle Gra-bow, on behalf of certain investors and shareholders in the Janus Family of Funds (“Funds”), brought this action against Pri-cewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PWC”), a certified public accounting firm. The claims arise from PWC’s alleged professional negligence in connection with its audits of the Funds. In particular, plaintiff alleges that defendant failed to discover…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Wilson v. Republic Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Larry Laughlin v. Kmart CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  5. Pfeiffer v. Hartford Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Potter v. Janus Investment FundDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2007
  2. Horattas v. Citigroup Financial Markets Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2007
  3. In re Alger, Columbia, Janus, MFS, One Group, & Putnam Mutual Fund LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2004
  4. Davis et al. v. Kozlowski et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2005
  5. In Re Alger, Columbia, Janus, MFS, One Group, Putnam Mut. Fund LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API