Legal Opinion
Smith v. United States
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided December 8, 1987No. Civ. 4-86-744PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MacLAUGHLIN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of sub ject matter jurisdiction or in the alternative for summary judgment. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment will be granted.
FACTS
Plaintiff Corrinne Smith and her husband plaintiff Robert Earl Smith are residents of Minneapolis, Minnesota. Plaintiff Group Health Inc. is a corporation also located in Minneapolis. At all relevant times, Group Health provided medical care coverage to Corrinne Smith. In this action, plaintiffs have brought suit against the United States…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Soriano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Logue v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Athanasios Roditis and Cathy Roditis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Cooper v. United States Government & General Services AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Schneider v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1990
- Duff v. United States Ex Rel. United States Air ForceDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1992
- Linda St. Denis v. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.