Legal Opinion

Shavonne Halterman v. Ryan Ervin, Lee Geiger, Brett Parrott, and County of Pulaski County, Missouri

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided February 18, 2026No. 6:25-cv-03101Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION SHAVONNE HALTERMAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 6:25-cv-03101-RK ) RYAN ERVIN, LEE GEIGER, BRETT ) PARROTT, and COUNTY OF ) PULASKI COUNTY, MISSOURI; ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER Before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss. (Doc. 7.) This motion has been fully briefed. (Docs. 9, 26, 33.)1 After careful consideration and for the reasons explained below, Defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Legal Standard To survive a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim under…

2Cases cited67 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API