Assistance of Counsel in Removal Proceedings (I)
Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel
1Opinion of the Court
Assistance of Counsel in Removal Proceedings ( I ) The Constitution does not confer a constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel in removal proceedings, because the alien has no constitutional right to counsel, including government-appointed counsel, in the first place. Although the Constitution does not entitle an alien to relief for his lawyer’s mistakes, the Department may, in its discretion, allow an alien to reopen removal proceedings based on the deficient performance of his lawyer. In extraordinary cases, where a lawyer’s deficient performance likely changed the outcome of…
2Cases cited95 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.