Legal Opinion

Zeide v. Flexser

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1941PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtKadien, J.

Motion by the defendant Flexser, appearing specially, to vacate the service of the summons and complaint herein upon him in the State of Florida, pursuant to an order of publication made in this action, and to vacate said order upon the ground that this court has no jurisdiction of the person of said defendant inasmuch as he is a non-resident.

The complaint states three causes of action. The first is for the reasonable value of professional services and for disbursements; the second is for money loaned; the third repeats by reference the allegations of the first and second causes of action and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. American Surety Co. v. ConnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Anthony v. . WoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  3. Dimmerling v. . AndrewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  4. Enthoven v. EnthovenNew York Supreme Court · 1938
  5. In re the Estate of HaberNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. River Farms, Inc. v. Superior Court of San Bernardino Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API