Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Evans

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 9, 1986No. 7721-3-IIPublished

1ConcurrenceReed, J.

(concurring specially)—I am constrained to concur specially in light of my brother Alexander's dissent, and because I believe the particular ground upon which the trial judge granted a new trial is much misunderstood.

What we have in the instant case is, purely and simply, a question of expert witness competency. Experience has taught us that such "experts" rarely agree. What may be a crucial "fact" to one, may not be to another.

Before affirming the grant of a new trial because the defense expert presented at trial overlooked or thought unimportant a fact or facts now deemed pertinent by an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Baxter v. Greyhound Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1964
  2. State v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Olpinski v. ClementWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Knecht v. MarzanoWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Zorotovich v. Washington Toll Bridge AuthorityWashington Supreme Court · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API