Legal Opinion

MG Altus Apache Co. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided January 13, 2012No. 11-538CPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD

WILLIAMS, Judge.

In this post-award bid protest, MG Altus Apache Company (“MG AA”) challenges the awards of multiple contracts by the Department of the Army (“Army”) for trucking services in the Afghanistan Theater of Operations. MG AA alleges that the Army improperly determined MG AA to be nonresponsible.

The matter comes before the Court on MG AA’s Motion to Supplement the Administrative Record (“AR”). MG AA seeks to supplement the AR with correspondence relating to letters of concern and cure…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Axiom Resource Management, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  4. John C. Grimberg Company, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  5. Vanguard Recovery Assistance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mvs USA, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  2. Insight Public Sector, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
  3. Tellus Strategies, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API