Legal Opinion
Rochow v. Spring Arbor Township
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided July 7, 1986No. Docket 82818PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJ. C. Timms, J.
Plaintiffs’ complaint for injunctive relief charged that defendants’ contemplated activities in removing certain trees along Bower-man Road in Spring Arbor Township, Jackson County, and in widening and paving said road would violate the provisions of the Michigan Environmental Protection Act, MCL 691.1201 et seq.; MSA 14.528(201) et seq., and would result in a taking of plaintiffs’ property without just compensation. Following an evidentiary hearing, the circuit judge found no cause for action and dismissed the complaint. We affirm.
Plaintiffs, who have resided on Bowerman Road for over ten…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Eager v. State Highway CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Foster v. WileyMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
- City of Portage v. Kalamazoo County Road CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
- Sowels v. LABORERS'INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NAMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- Kimberly Hills Neighborhood Ass'n v. DionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kent County Road Commission v. HuntingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
- West Michigan Park Ass'n v. FoggMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
- West Michigan Park Ass'n v. FoggMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987