Legal Opinion

Sisk v. Sisk

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 2006No. 20050232PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] Stewart Sisk appeals from an amended judgment modifying custody and visitation and awarding attorney’s fees. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] Stewart and Tammi Sisk were divorced in 2003. Stewart remained in North Dakota, and Tammi moved to Oklahoma. By stipulation, Stewart received physical custody of the parties’ three minor children, and the judgment provided Tammi was to have “reasonable and liberal visitation as agreed upon [bjetween the parties and the minor children” and “reasonable access to the [children] by written, telephonic, and electronic means.”

[¶ 3] Tammi had little…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Paulson v. PaulsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Kemp v. City of Grand ForksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Eberhardt v. EberhardtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Sweeney v. SweeneyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  5. In re the Marriage of KimbrellCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Marquette v. MarquetteNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Eifert v. EifertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Martodam v. MartodamNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  4. State v. Lori T.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2022
  5. Vetter v. Vetter, et al.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2026

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API