Legal Opinion
State v. Lori T.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided October 18, 2022No. SC20520PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. LORI T.* (SC 20520) McDonald, D’Auria, Mullins, Kahn, Ecker and Keller, Js. Syllabus Pursuant to statute (§ 53a-98 (a) (3)), a person is guilty of custodial interfer- ence in the second degree when, ‘‘knowing that he [or she] has no legal right to do so, he [or she] holds, keeps or otherwise refuses to return a child who is less than sixteen years old to such child’s lawful custodian after a request by such custodian for the return of such child.’’ * In accordance with federal law; see 18 U.S.C. § 2265(d) (3) (2018), as amended by the Violence Against Women Act…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Colten v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. Daren Y.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2024
- State v. Michael R.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2023