Breckenridge v. Ashley
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMelvin Mayfield, Judge
I dissent, in part, from the result reached by the majority in the per curiam opinion issued today in this matter. I agree that the notice of appeal in this case was not timely filed insofar as an appeal from the decree filed in this case is concerned. However, I do not agree that the notice of appeal — which states it is also appealing from the denial of the appellant’s motion for new trial — is ineffective insofar as the denial of the motion for new trial is concerned.
Here, the appellant did not file a motion for new trial as described in Arkansas Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(b) (now…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fuller v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- Enos v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Hicks v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Webster v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- Cornett v. PratherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.