Legal Opinion

Hicks v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 20, 1996No. CR 96-482PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant, Randolph George Hicks, by his attorneys, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorneys, Wayne Emmons of Hardy, Arkansas, and Edward Witt Chandler, who was admitted to practice in Arkansas by comity pursuant to Rule XIV of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar, state by motion that they were notified by the Clerk of this court that the record could not be filed because the notice of appeal was filed late. Appellant’s attorneys state by motion that they disagree that the notice of appeal was late.

In a Baxter County jury trial held on December 4 and 5, 1995, appellant,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clark v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  2. Oliver v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  3. Webster v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  4. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Robinson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  2. Lewellen v. Supreme Court Committee on Professional ConductSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  3. Breckenridge v. AshleyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996
  4. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  5. Mallett v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API