Legal Opinion
Winningham v. Sexton
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided April 29, 1993No. C-1-91-447PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND NEW TRIAL
SPIEGEL, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Plaintiffs Motion for a New Trial (doc. 265), North American Resources Corporation’s (“NARC”) Response (doc. 269), the Plaintiffs Reply (doc. 276), the Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 280), the Supplemental Defendant Insurance Company of North America (“INA”) and Neare, Gibbs & Company’s (“Neare, Gibbs”) Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 286), the Plaintiffs Reply (doc. 287), INA’s Reply (doc. 290), and the parties’ Stipulation of Clarification (doc. 292).
The primary issue…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- William Butler Smith v. Leman HudsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
- Mellon Bank, N.A. v. Aetna Business Credit, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Kelly v. Medical Life InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Simmons Capital Advisors, Ltd. v. Bachinski (In Re Bachinski)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2008
- Continental Insurance v. George J. Beemsterboer, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2015
- Dale M. Winningham v. North American Resources CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994