Legal Opinion

Campbell v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided October 4, 2001No. 14-00-01076-CVPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAJORITY OPINION

FOWLER, Justice.

This is an accelerated appeal from an extension of courtrordered mental health services. Nathan Dale Campbell, appellant, briefs this court on several issues for our review. He contends (1) the trial court erred in overruling his objection to proceeding with a hearing without two medical certificates on file; (2) the evidence is factually insufficient to justify his confinement; (3) his re-commitment to Rusk State Hospital was fundamentally unfair and denied him due process of law; (4) the court erred by proceeding to a hearing on the day the State’s…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  3. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Campbell v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Campbell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
  3. Campbell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
  4. Evans v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
  5. Candelario Marroquin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2003

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API