Legal Opinion

Brown v. Smith

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 12, 1984No. Civ. A. 81-1256PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

CALDWELL, District Judge.

I. Introduction

Before the court for disposition are two motions filed on behalf of defendants in this case. The federal defendants have filed a motion to dismiss and the remaining state defendants have filed a summary judgment motion. 1 Plaintiff has filed timely opposition to these motions. Upon review of the entire record we have concluded that the federal defendants’ dismissal motion must be granted. Moreover, since no genuine issue of material fact exists with regard to the summary judgment motion, the state defendants are entitled to judgment as a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Olim v. WakinekonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Howe v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Commonwealth v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  5. Garfield v. DavisDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Benjamin v. PotterDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1986
  2. Hudson v. IsraelDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1984
  3. Story v. MorganDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Hannon v. AllenDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003
  5. Pendleton Enterprises, Inc. v. Iams Co.District Court, D. Utah · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API