Legal Opinion
Hudson v. Israel
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided October 4, 1984No. 83-C-849PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
WARREN, District Judge.
Presently before the Court in this matter is the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The Court has carefully considered this matter and concludes, for the reasons stated herein, that the motion must be granted, subject, however, to the plaintiffs petitioning to reopen as to a proper party-defendant.
BACKGROUND
This action was initiated on February 18, 1983, when the plaintiff, James Hudson, filed his pro se complaint…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Johnson v. AverySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Anthony F. McDonald v. Frank A. HallCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Vaughn v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- James Edward Clayton v. Robert J. Tansy, Warden, His Agents, Servants, Employees and Others Acting in Aid And/or Concert TherewithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Hannon v. AllenDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003
- Pendleton Enterprises, Inc. v. Iams Co.District Court, D. Utah · 1994
- Carper v. DeLandDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1994