Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Ignasiak v. Town of Franklin

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1954PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGehl, J.

From the record and briefs it appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with the terms of the judgment. That fact of itself does not make him a contemnor. Not every failure to obey a judgment constitutes contempt of court. For instance, inability of the alleged contemnor to obey a decree, if not brought upon himself, may be a defense to a charge for contempt.

“It is true that the remedy is severe and harsh. Imprisonment certainly should not be ordered when it appears that the default is the result of honest inability to pay, on account of business misfortunes, or lack of health or earning…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Staples v. StaplesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Parke, Austin & Lipscomb, Inc. v. SexauerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Will of BrittWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Novo Industrial Corp. v. NissenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  2. City of Madison v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Geis v. McKennaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Spring v. SpringWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API