Legal Opinion
Hazara Enterprises, Inc. v. Motiva Enterprises, LLC
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided December 21, 2000No. 99-8568-CIVPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
HURLEY, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the defendants Motiva Enterprises, LLC (“MOTIVA”) and Shell Oil Company (“SHELL”)’s motion to dismiss the plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint or in the alternative for summary judgment [DE# 73] 1 in a case brought under the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2801 et seq. (“PMPA” or “Act”). The gravamen of the Complaint is that Shell evaded a provision of the PMPA that requires service station franchisors like Shell to offer assignment of lease…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Johnson Enterprises of Jacksonville, Inc. v. FPL Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- George A. Veracka v. Shell Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Rosenberg v. Pillsbury Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Flight Concepts Ltd. Partnership v. Boeing Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1993
- Jeetendra L. Shukla, Individually v. Bp Exploration & Oil, Inc., A.K.A. Bp Oil Company, Petro Distributing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- MDS (Canada), Inc. v. Rad Source Technologies, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2011
- Pinnacle Communications International, Inc. v. American Family Mortgage Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2006
- Equilon Enterprises, L.L.C. v. Rahim, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- PINNACLE COMMUNICATIONS INTERN. v. American Fam. Mortg.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2006