Reddinger v. Sena Severance Pay Plan
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.
Scott LeFebvre and Melissa Reddinger maintain they should have received severance benefits after they left the paper mill where they both worked. However, the company’s plan only provided for severance to persons whose employment was involuntarily terminated. Although the company initially offered LeFebvre and Reddinger a May termination date when the mill had been set to close in the spring, by the time they returned the requisite release forms, the company had informed them that the mill would be staying open longer and that their new termination dates would be later…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Aetna Health Inc. v. DavilaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Pegram v. HerdrichSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Hoffman v. Red Owl Stores, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Miller v. Illinois Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Carlson v. Northrop Grumman Severance PlanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022