Legal Opinion

Judkins v. Robison

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1913No. 2567PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Original application to- the Supreme Court by Judkins for writ of mandamus against Robison as Commissioner of the General Land Office.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Phillips

By an Act of the Thirty-third Legislature (chapter 160, page 336) it is provided, in respect to any of the public free school lands purchased from the State after January 1, 1907, and prior to January 1, 1913, on condition of settlement and residence, the sale of which may be forfeited after its enactment on account of non-payment of interest accrued before the passage of the Act, that the owner of such land at the date of the forfeiture shall have the right for a period of ninety days after notice of classification and appraisement of his land as provided by the Act, to repurchase any of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chapman v. Kansas City, Clinton & Springfield Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  2. Island City Savings Bank v. DowlearnTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Barker v. TorreyTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Glasgow v. TerrellTexas Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Rhoads Drilling Co. v. AllredTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Rose v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986
  3. Liddell v. BlevinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  4. Boykin v. Southwest Texas Oil & Gas Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  5. Barber v. GilesTexas Supreme Court · 1948

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API