Thys v. Rivard
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBeals, C. J.
Plaintiffs, Ed. Thys and Albert K. Miller, co-partners under the firm name of Thys & Miller, instituted this action against Wilfred E. and Lucy Rivard, as defendants, asking for judgment for royalties alleged to be due under a written agreement, signed by plaintiffs and defendant Wilfred E. Rivard (who will hereinafter be referred to as though he were the sole party defendant in this action). Plaintiffs also asked for an accounting, for an attorney’s fee, and for general relief.
It is admitted that the parties signed the agreement, referred to in plaintiffs’ complaint and a copy of which was…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- New Marshall Engine Co. v. Marshall Engine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Wade v. LawderSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Edison Electric Light Co. v. Peninsular Light, Power & Heat Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1900
- Kroegher v. McConway & Torley Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
- Edison Electric Light Co. v. Peninsular Light, Power & Heat Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Michigan · 1899
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Thys v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- Thys v. RivardWashington Supreme Court · 1947