Lund v. Gillman

Loring, Justice.

This was an action on an injunction bond. Judgment was rendered for plaintiff after defendants’ entire answer was stricken on motion as sham and frivolous. Defendant Gillman has appealed.

The present difficulty arose out of the following facts: Plaintiff Lund and defendant Gillman entered into a contract whereby Gill-man sold to Lund an oil and gasoline station and Lund agreed to pay $50 per month upon the purchase price and to purchase gasoline exclusively from Gillman until the purchase price for the station was paid. April 9, 1938, Gillman, contending that Lund was violat…