Legal Opinion

Michitsch v. Stimfel

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1957PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLouis L. Friedman, J.

Both defendants, each through his respective attorney and by way of separate motions, seek to strike paragraphs sixth, seventh and eighth of plaintiff’s complaint, on the ground that the statements contained in those paragraphs are irrelevant. ,

Plaintiff sues to recover for personal injuries sustained by him while he was a passenger in an automobile said to have been owned by defendant Stimfel and operated at the time of the accident by defendant Wittreich. At the time of the accident, the car was being driven on Route 15 in Rockaway Township, Morris County, New Jersey.

In addition to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schindler v. Royal Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. In Re the Estate of RechtschaffenNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  3. Merkling v. Ford Motor Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  4. Roach v. Yonkers RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  5. Sims v. Union News Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ando v. WoodberryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API