Legal Opinion

Losh v. Brunk

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 28, 1924Published

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

The action below was to contest the validity of the will of Samuel J. Irvin, deceased.

The defendant in error, Velma Brunk, who was plaintiff below, was the daughter and only child of the said Samuel II. Irvin, deceased, and brought suit to set aside the will of her father. Both the *413questions of mental capacity and undue influence were raised in the trial of the case. The issues were made up in accordance with the statute and were submitted to the jury. The jury returned a verdict finding the will not to be the valid last will and testament of Samuel J. Irvin. Judgment was entered on the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Krell v. Krell Piano Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API