Legal Opinion

Krasnow v. Krasnow

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 27, 1925PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

This case comes before us on exceptions of the defendant to the denial of his motion for a directed verdict and to the order directing a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. At the trial no ground of exception was requested or stated. Every ground therefore is open. Proctor v. Dillon, 235 Mass. 538, 540. The action is on a promissory note dated April 5, 1923, due in three months. It became due on July 5, 1923, and the maker was entitled to the whole of that day in which to pay the note. The writ was dated on July 5,1923. The action was prematurely brought. The motion for a directed verdict…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Proctor v. DillonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  2. Rosenblatt v. FoleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  3. Estes v. TowerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Connors v. WickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  2. Anderson v. Beacon Oil Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  3. Wershba v. City of LynnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  4. Howe v. National Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  5. London Clothes, Ltd. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API