Legal Opinion
(PC) Kulp v. Stanislaus County Sheriff Department
District Court, E.D. California
Decided August 19, 2022No. 1:22-cv-00829Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 ANTHONY JAMES KULP, Case No. 1:22-cv-00829-SAB (PC) 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT 12 v. JUDGE TO THIS ACTION 13 STANISLAUS CO. SHERIFF DEPT., et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF 14 Defendants. ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A COGNIZABLE CLAIM 15 (ECF No. 6) 16 17 18 Plaintiff Anthony James Kulp is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 19 rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.