Legal Opinion

Wells Fargo Bank v. Neilsen

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 10, 2009No. A122626PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HAERLE, Acting P. J.

I. INTRODUCTION

Appellant is the former owner of a residence located at 1725 Van Burén Street in San Mateo. Respondents Wells Fargo Bank (WFB) and PHH Mortgage Corporation (PHH) are two of the former three holders of deeds of trust on that property. Respondent Robert Curtis, an attorney, was the foreclosure trustee for the property, which was sold at public auction in March 2007 to WFB. Subsequent to that sale and the payment of the sum owing to the third lienholder, a dispute arose as to the proper allocation of the remaining funds, some $368,000. Appellant claimed…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Moeller v. Chun-Yen LienCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  2. Caito v. United California BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Strutt v. Ontario Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Cockerell v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Melendrez v. D & I INVESTMENT, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Eden Place v. Sholem PerlCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. Eden Place, LLC v. Perl (In Re Perl)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Tomar Dev., Inc. v. FriendColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Cal-Western Reconveyance v. Brown CA2/1California Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. Eden Place v. Sholem PerlCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API